The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous stars were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites using both totally free casino-style games and financially rewarding rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the business deals with allegations of unlawful sports betting in a New York suit that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'develop a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences in between standard gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads generally focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for actual gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement revealing off Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The disparity in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never make a purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments offer consumers a possibility to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be used to open various features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting customers to obtain other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need usually require identification. However, websites like Chumba will request for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable clients to send mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, therefore offering them a reason to attempt their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gaming websites like casinos.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that use them the opportunity to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're usually not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities frequently connected with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-term advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the income earned by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually since been shuttered over allegations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face similar examination.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney generals as crucial consider determining that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for unlawful gaming.'

One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are forgoing substantial tax and revenue chances as this gambling changes that carried out through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest lawsuit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

'We typically don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably common across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to vigorously protect any claim which might be brought against us.'

The problems between standard online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position versus prohibited gaming - specifically when trying to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to clients the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our worths are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat along with courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton